Product Promotion Network

Computer Review

Computer Review

Trading Review Focus on Super Micro Computer (SMCI)

Investors might be looking to track the ATR or Average True Range of the stock. Currently, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) has a 14-day ATR of 0.76. The Average True Range is an investor tool used to measure stock volatility.

The ATR is not used to figure out price direction, just to measure volatility. The ATR is an indicator developed by J. Welles Wilder.

Wilder has developed multiple indicators that are still quite popular in today’s investing landscape. The general interpretation of the ATR is the higher the ATR value, the higher the volatility. The Williams Percent Range or Williams %R is another technical indicator worth checking out.

Super Micro Computer (SMCI) currently has a 14 day Williams %R of -50.50. The Williams %R fluctuates between 0 and -100 measuring whether a security is overbought or oversold. The Williams %R is similar to the Stochastic Oscillator except it is plotted upside-down.

Levels above -20 may indicate the stock may be considered is overbought. If the indicator travels under -80, this may signal that the stock is oversold. Chart analysts may also use the indicator to project possible price reversals and to define trends.

The Average Directional Index or ADX is technical analysis indicator used to discern if a market is trending or not trending. The ADX alone measures trend strength but not direction. Using the ADX with the Plus Directional Indicator (+DI) and Minus Directional Indicator (-DI) may help determine the direction of the trend as well as the overall momentum.

Many traders will use the ADX alongside other indicators in order to help spot proper trading entry/exit points. Currently, the 14-day ADX for Super Micro Computer (SMCI) is 37.56. Generally speaking, an ADX value from 0-25 would indicate an absent or weak trend.

A value of 25-50 would indicate a strong trend. A value of 50-75 would signal a very strong trend, and a value of 75-100 would indicate an extremely strong trend. Traders may be leaning on technical stock analysis to help with investing decisions.

Super Micro Computer (SMCI) currently has a 14-day Commodity Channel Index (CCI) of -79.47. Despite the name, CCI can be used on other investment tools such as stocks. The CCI was designed to typically stay within the reading of -100 to +100.

Traders may use the indicator to determine stock trends or to identify overbought/oversold conditions. A CCI reading above +100 would imply that the stock is overbought and possibly ready for a correction. On the other hand, a reading of -100 would imply that the stock is oversold and possibly set for a rally.

Traders are paying renewed attention to shares of Super Micro Computer (SMCI). The current 14-day RSI is presently sitting at 30.94, the 7-day is 27.12, and the 3-day is 33.19. The RSI, or Relative Strength Index is a popular oscillating indicator among traders and investors.

The RSI operates in a range-bound area with values between 0 and 100. When the RSI line moves up, the stock may be experiencing strength. The opposite is the case when the RSI line is heading lower.

Different time periods may be used when using the RSI indicator. The RSI may be more volatile using a shorter period of time. Many traders keep an eye on the 30 and 70 marks on the RSI scale.

A move above 70 is widely considered to show the stock as overbought, and a move below 30 would indicate that the stock may be oversold. Traders may use these levels to help identify stock price reversals. Investors may be searching for stocks that are undervalued.

Scanning the markets during obvious pullbacks may be one strategy, but it may take a more concerted effort to identify these names if the market decides to climb further. Getting caught up in the details from news and various economic reports may leave the average investor dizzy and confused. Focusing on the most important data sets may be helpful when trying to muffle all the noise.

Heading into the next quarter, investors will be watching which companies are experiencing positive earnings momentum. Often times, earnings that vastly beat expectations may cause the stock to skyrocket. Filling the portfolio with stocks experiencing positive earnings momentum may be a popular choice.

Investors may want to look a little bit deeper into the situation to make sure that the momentum is justified.

Some investors may already be adept at figuring this out while others may need to put in a bit more work.

SIMULACRA Review – Simulate. Assimilate. Exterminate. – COGconnected


Right now, you are reading this on a screen. Be it on a computer, phone, or tablet, you’re staring into a black mirror while information is fed into your mind. What else have you done today?

Have you checked Facebook or Twitter? Updated your Tinder profile? Maybe Snapchatted some friends?

Regardless, a piece of you has been made public in some way, whether you intended it to be or not. When all of those pieces are assembled, who do people see? Is it the real you, laying bare the depths of your mind and soul?

Unlikely. It’s a shallow facsimile of your flesh and blood self. It’s a calculated, perfect image that you’ve crafted by accentuating your strengths and satirizing your weaknesses.

There’s nothing wrong with that; everyone does it. However, doesn’t it make your human form seem… inferior?
[embedded content]

Such questions surround SIMULACRA: a tech thriller in the vein of Black Mirror that is told primarily through text messages. Upon finding the phone of a girl named Anna, you quickly learn that she’s in some sort of peril. The phone glitches out, showing a video of her terrified state, and incoming messages quickly make it clear that she’s gone without a trace.

From there, it’s a matter of exploring the phone, piecing together clues to uncover secrets, and making decisions about who might help or hinder you. Puzzles are one of SIMULACRA’s strongest points. The exception is a text message reassembly minigame, which involves unscrambling corrupted texts; usually these are either painfully easy or solved through trial and error.

Otherwise, puzzles involve scouring through the phone for critical information, all while making connections based on the contents of emails, texts, and more. It really makes you feel like a badass cyber detective, while also encouraging you to absorb the story. Being thorough in investigations is key to success, so you’re liable to be going through Anna’s story with a fine-toothed comb in search of leads.


“Most of the characters are completely one-dimensional, and to put it bluntly, a lot of them are assholes.”

That story is pretty good, even if the writing isn’t spectacular. Part of this may be down to the frequently futile dialogue system. In many cases, all the options eventually lead to the same outcome.

There are branching paths, though, triggered through events such as lying, manipulating, or coming clean about issues to certain people. These culminate in one of four endings, though one of them is significantly easier to obtain than the others. I did two runs, making different choices each time, yet it all concluded in the same way.

Regardless, what starts out as a “missing person” plot quickly devolves into something far more sinister, calling into question online relationships and social media presences. Most of the characters are completely one-dimensional, and to put it bluntly, a lot of them are assholes. The two male leads whose conversations monopolize your time are varying degrees of callous, delusional, lewd, and utterly distasteful.

One of Anna’s friends rewards respect with vitriol. Ultimately, trying to appease certain characters in later playthroughs made me scrunch up my face and utter all manner of crude things. At least they’re well-acted; while the sections that utilize live-action video and audio were clearly made on a budget, they’re well-produced and never broke up the pace of the game.

Simulacra ins1 What did break up the game was its horror elements. SIMULACRA frequently excels at developing a tense atmosphere.

Several times, a sudden phone call or notification in-game literally made me jump in my chair because I was so focused on some other task. Certain changes to the phone’s interface are so subtle that they made me second-guess whether anything was different. However, not content with subtlety, SIMULACRA also throws in that old horror classic: jump scares.

Simply put: they’re completely unnecessary. They add nothing to the story, trying to capitalize on the already-tense atmosphere by playing sudden loud noises and showing horrifically distorted images. With only a handful throughout the experience, they didn’t get too egregious, but even that felt like too many.

Despite my numerous complaints with it, SIMULACRA was, at its core, a title that had me engrossed. My first playthrough was nearly completed in one sitting, and I still felt compelled to go back for more. I got so invested that I literally spent hours researching Greek mythology, Morse code, and important mathematical values to attempt to solve a side objective for an achievement.

I never figured it out, but I still don’t want to give up. Really, that’s what SIMULACRA has going for it. Much like us, it’s rough around the edges and may seem unremarkable.

Look a bit closer, though, and there’s a lot more going on beneath the surface.

*** PC code provided by the publisher ***

The Good

  • Thought-provoking story
  • Clever puzzles
  • Subtle yet surprisingly tense

The Bad

  • Dry writing
  • Pointless jump scares

Concurrent Computer Corporation (NasdaqGM:CCUR)’s Valuation Review According to Quant

Concurrent Computer Corporation (NasdaqGM:CCUR) has an ERP5 rank of 13156. The ERP5 Rank is an investment tool that analysts use to discover undervalued companies. The ERP5 looks at the Price to Book ratio, Earnings Yield, ROIC and 5 year average ROIC. The lower the ERP5 rank, the more undervalued a company is thought to be.

Q.i. Value The Q.i.

Value of Concurrent Computer Corporation (NasdaqGM:CCUR) is 89.00000. The Q.i. Value is another helpful tool in determining if a company is undervalued or not.

The Q.i. Value is calculated using the following ratios: EBITDA Yield, Earnings Yield, FCF Yield, and Liquidity. The lower the Q.i. value, the more undervalued the company is thought to be.

The EBITDA Yield is a great way to determine a company’s profitability. This number is calculated by dividing a company’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization by the company’s enterprise value. Enterprise Value is calculated by taking the market capitalization plus debt, minority interest and preferred shares, minus total cash and cash equivalents.

The EBITDA Yield for Concurrent Computer Corporation (NasdaqGM:CCUR) is -0.334135. The Earnings to Price yield of Concurrent Computer Corporation (NasdaqGM:CCUR) is 0.432000. This is calculated by taking the earnings per share and dividing it by the last closing share price.

This is one of the most popular methods investors use to evaluate a company’s financial performance. Earnings Yield is calculated by taking the operating income or earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) and dividing it by the Enterprise Value of the company. The Earnings Yield for Concurrent Computer Corporation NasdaqGM:CCUR is -0.381488.

Earnings Yield helps investors measure the return on investment for a given company. Similarly, the Earnings Yield Five Year Average is the five year average operating income or EBIT divided by the current enterprise value. The Earnings Yield Five Year average for Concurrent Computer Corporation is 0.040068.

FCF Yield 5yr Avg The FCF Yield 5yr Average is calculated by taking the five year average free cash flow of a company, and dividing it by the current enterprise value. Enterprise Value is calculated by taking the market capitalization plus debt, minority interest and preferred shares, minus total cash and cash equivalents.

The average FCF of a company is determined by looking at the cash generated by operations of the company. The Free Cash Flow Yield 5 Year Average of Concurrent Computer Corporation (NasdaqGM:CCUR) is 0.052891. Price to book, Price to cash flow, Price to earnings

The Price to book ratio is the current share price of a company divided by the book value per share. The Price to Book ratio for Concurrent Computer Corporation NasdaqGM:CCUR is 1.511349. A lower price to book ratio indicates that the stock might be undervalued.

Similarly, Price to cash flow ratio is another helpful ratio in determining a company’s value. The Price to Cash Flow for Concurrent Computer Corporation (NasdaqGM:CCUR) is -21.869786. This ratio is calculated by dividing the market value of a company by cash from operating activities.

Additionally, the price to earnings ratio is another popular way for analysts and investors to determine a company’s profitability. The price to earnings ratio for Concurrent Computer Corporation (NasdaqGM:CCUR) is 2.314817. This ratio is found by taking the current share price and dividing by earnings per share.

Value Comp 1 / Value Comp 2 The Value Composite One (VC1) is a method that investors use to determine a company’s value. The VC1 of Concurrent Computer Corporation (NasdaqGM:CCUR) is 54.

A company with a value of 0 is thought to be an undervalued company, while a company with a value of 100 is considered an overvalued company. The VC1 is calculated using the price to book value, price to sales, EBITDA to EV, price to cash flow, and price to earnings. Similarly, the Value Composite Two (VC2) is calculated with the same ratios, but adds the Shareholder Yield.

The Value Composite Two of Concurrent Computer Corporation (NasdaqGM:CCUR) is 43. Volatility 12 m, 6m, 3m Stock volatility is a percentage that indicates whether a stock is a desirable purchase.

Investors look at the Volatility 12m to determine if a company has a low volatility percentage or not over the course of a year. The Volatility 12m of Concurrent Computer Corporation (NasdaqGM:CCUR) is 29.644800. This is calculated by taking weekly log normal returns and standard deviation of the share price over one year annualized.

The lower the number, a company is thought to have low volatility. The Volatility 3m is a similar percentage determined by the daily log normal returns and standard deviation of the share price over 3 months. The Volatility 3m of Concurrent Computer Corporation (NasdaqGM:CCUR) is 35.083900.

The Volatility 6m is the same, except measured over the course of six months. The Volatility 6m is 37.702300. MF Rank

The MF Rank (aka the Magic Formula) is a formula that pinpoints a valuable company trading at a good price. The formula is calculated by looking at companies that have a high earnings yield as well as a high return on invested capital. The MF Rank of Concurrent Computer Corporation (NasdaqGM:CCUR) is 15903.

A company with a low rank is considered a good company to invest in. The Magic Formula was introduced in a book written by Joel Greenblatt, entitled, “The Little Book that Beats the Market”. Piotroski F-Score

The Piotroski F-Score is a scoring system between 1-9 that determines a firm’s financial strength. The score helps determine if a company’s stock is valuable or not. The Piotroski F-Score of Concurrent Computer Corporation (NasdaqGM:CCUR) is 4.

A score of nine indicates a high value stock, while a score of one indicates a low value stock. The score is calculated by the return on assets (ROA), Cash flow return on assets (CFROA), change in return of assets, and quality of earnings. It is also calculated by a change in gearing or leverage, liquidity, and change in shares in issue.

The score is also determined by change in gross margin and change in asset turnover. Return on Assets There are many different tools to determine whether a company is profitable or not.

One of the most popular ratios is the “Return on Assets” (aka ROA). This score indicates how profitable a company is relative to its total assets. The Return on Assets for Concurrent Computer Corporation (NasdaqGM:CCUR) is 0.627399.

This number is calculated by dividing net income after tax by the company’s total assets.

A company that manages their assets well will have a higher return, while a company that manages their assets poorly will have a lower return.

Share this post

1 2 3 924