Product Promotion Network

Monthly Archives: October 2016

FBI review involves thousands of newly discovered Clinton emails

WASHINGTON — The FBI will have to sort through thousands of newly discovered emails in its renewed examination of the practices of Hillary Clinton and her aides, a U.S. official said Monday, raising questions about whether any findings might be released before Election Day. The Justice Department, moving to address concerns over the timing of the revelation of the emails and a potential post-election spillover, said Monday it would “dedicate all necessary resources” to concluding the review promptly.

The timing matters because Donald Trump has been assailing Clinton ever more vigorously since FBI Director James Comey revealed the existence of the emails in a remarkable and ambiguous letter to Congress last Friday. He said agents would take steps to review the messages, which were found on a computer seized during an unrelated investigation involving the estranged husband of a Clinton aide. Rep.

Anthony Weiner, the disgraced former New York congressman, is being investigated in connection with online communications with a teenage girl. He was separated this year from Huma Abedin, one of Clinton’s closest advisers. At the White House, spokesman Josh Earnest said he would neither defend nor criticize the timing of Comey’s disclosure.

But he also said President Barack Obama does not believe Comey was trying to influence the election, or strategizing to benefit one candidate or party. “He’s in a tough spot, and he’s the one who will be in a position to defend his actions in the face of significant criticism from a variety of legal experts, including individuals who served in senior Department of Justice positions in administrations that were led by presidents in both parties,” Earnest said. It was not immediately clear exactly how many emails have been recovered or what significance, if any, they might have.

But the U.S. official who spoke to The Associated Press said the trove numbers in the thousands and the FBI, which had a warrant to begin the review, would be focusing on those deemed pertinent to its earlier Clinton email server investigation. It’s unclear how many emails might be relevant. In its letter to lawmakers, the department promised to “continue to work closely with the FBI and together dedicate all necessary resources and take appropriate steps as expeditiously as possible.”

The FBI and Justice Department closed that investigation, which examined whether Clinton and her aides had mishandled classified information, without charges in July. The official who spoke to the AP was not authorized to discuss an ongoing investigation by name and spoke on condition of anonymity. The fact that another cache of emails potentially important to the investigation has only recently been discovered raises an immediate question: How could Abedin have been unaware of their existence?

The answer is not yet clear, but it’s possible that either she did not know about the emails on the computer of her estranged husband, forgot about them or for some other reason did not turn them over. In a sworn deposition taken in June as part of a lawsuit filed by the conservative legal group Judicial Watch, Abedin was asked about what devices she had used to send or receive messages from her account on the server. As part of the process in 2015 of returning her work-related emails to the State Department, Abedin said she “looked for all the devices that may have any of my State Department” work and provided two laptops and a Blackberry to her lawyers for review.

Abedin made no mention of there being additional devices where her emails might have been saved. If the FBI finds emails Abedin sent or received through the server archived on the device recently recovered from her home, that would appear to conflict with what she told the FBI earlier this year. In an April interview, Abedin told FBI agents that after she left the State Department in 2013, Clinton’s staff transitioned to a different email sever and she “lost most of her old emails as a result.” She said she had only accessed her account through a web portal and that she “did not have a method for archiving her old emails prior to the transition.”

A person familiar with the investigation said the device that appears to be at the center of the new review belonged only to Weiner and was not a computer he shared with Abedin. As a result, it was not a device Abedin searched for work-related emails at the time of the initial investigation, according to the person, who said of Abedin that it was “news to her” that her emails would be on a computer belonging to her husband. Even if the recovered emails are found to contain classified information, it’s not clear what impact that would have on the investigation.

Comey has already described Clinton and her aides as “extremely careless” and has said agents found scores of classified emails on Clinton’s server. But he also said there was no evidence they intended to mishandle classified information or obstructed justice, elements he suggested would be necessary for a prosecution.

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Book review underscores America’s need to hold national conversation on beach privilege

As pressing as the 2016 election might seem, whichever candidate prevails will confront an America in many ways more divided than ever before. Consider, for example, the Beach Boys. Some may remember when the country unified behind President Reagan to demand that the band be allowed to play the Independence Day concert on the National Mall, despite a caution by Interior Secretary James Watt that rock bands attracted the wrong element to the festivities.

Those were simpler times, and the idea that the Beach Boys were ever a national treasure shared by all has been challenged recently in the New York Review of Books[1]. Ben Ratiff made his own waves by exposing the ugly truth: the Beach Boys’ biggest hits were nothing more than “poem of unenlightened straight-male privilege, white privilege, beach privilege” that played no part in helping anyone achieve their social rights. What was that again, after straight-male privilege and white privilege?

Definitely putting the s/t debut by Beach Privilege on my year-end list.

— Steven Hyden (@Steven_Hyden) October 29, 2016[2]

@Lachlan[3] “Next up, a 5K tome on why Jimmy Buffet’s music is problematic and lacks recognition of beach privilege” — 4th Class Officer (@4thClassOfficer) October 31, 2016[4]

Oh wow, just saw a three year old boy crying. I asked why.

He simply responded, “beach privilege.”

— Mark Maxwell (@MaxwellRBR) October 31, 2016[5]

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter[6][7]

recent stories



  1. ^ New York Review of Books (
  2. ^ October 29, 2016 (
  3. ^ @Lachlan (
  4. ^ October 31, 2016 (
  5. ^ October 31, 2016 (
  6. ^ Share on Facebook (
  7. ^ Share on Twitter (

Volvo’s driverless cars will be unmarked to prevent them being bullied

Volvo is gearing up for a driverless car trial involving 100 cars that will be unmarked due to fears that motorists will bully the vehicles. The trial is set to get underway in 2018 in London, and will use versions of the Swedish company’s vehicles that look like normal Volvos. The firm’s precautionary approach is the result of research which found that motorists were likely to overtake and cut off driverless cars.

Related: Who’s to blame when driverless cars get it wrong?[1] A London School of Economics study of 2,000 drivers over 11 countries revealed that “some see autonomous vehicles as a potential nuisance, while others see an opportunity to take advantage of, or ‘bully’, AVs.” Erik Coelingh, Volvo’s senior technical leader, told The Observer: “From the outside you won’t see that it’s a self-driving car.

From a purely scientific perspective it would be interesting to have some cars that are marked as self-driving cars and some that are not and see whether other road users react in a different way.” “I’m pretty sure that people will challenge them if they are marked by doing really harsh braking in front of a self-driving car or putting themselves in the way.” The trial will be the first to use volunteers from the public, who will sit in the driving seat of the 4x4s and activate the self-driving technology on relatively simple roads.

Earlier this year Volvo announced a joint project with Uber, where both companies would invest £300m (?250m) to create self-driving cars, with Volvo producing the vehicles and Uber using them as part of its service. Volvo has already been testing autonomous cars in Gothenburg, Sweden, with H?kan Samuelsson, President and CEO, saying: “Our vision is that by 2020 no one should be killed or seriously injured in a new Volvo car.” WATCH: Tesla Model S Review – The Ultimate Rental Car?

Let us know what you think of Volvo’s plans in the comments.


  1. ^ Who’s to blame when driverless cars get it wrong? (

1 2 3 842