Product Promotion Network

Monthly Archives: July 2016

Finding Dory review – strikingly lovely

Pacy and playful : Finding Dory. Photograph: Disney/Pixar

The very best of the sequels attempted by the Pixar studio manage to combine a familiar milieu with the opportunity to explore entirely different themes to the original films. Toy Story 21 (which was written but not directed by Finding Dory co-director Andrew Stanton), for example, looks at the fear of mortality through the prism of the playroom. Toy Story 32 takes on the aftermath of a relationship breakdown. Finding Dory, meanwhile, is slightly less adventurous thematically, in that it reprises the central motif of Finding Nemo3: that of the enduring parent-child bond, and the special embrace of family, in all its permutations. However, it is approached with such charm and warmth that it hardly matters that the two films share such similar arcs.

In this case it is Dory, the amnesiac blue tang (voiced by Ellen DeGeneres4), who starts to piece together the recently unearthed fragments of her childhood memories and realises that she has a family, somewhere in the vast ocean. Her quest to find them takes Dory to the other side of the world and a California marine park (a voice cameo by Sigourney Weaver as herself, delivering the public address announcements, is one of the joys of the film). The rehabilitation tanks of the aquarium sick bay are home to the breakout star of the picture: Hank, the escapologist octopus (snappily voiced by Ed O Neill). Hank s endless repertoire of disguises is a sight gag that never gets old.

Pacy and playful in its humour, the film pauses only occasionally to let us appreciate the beauty of the animation. It is a strikingly lovely picture: the palette of velvety blues is accented by facets of shimmering light. Thomas Newman s score is equally well judged, emphasising the emotional but never drowning us in sentiment.

Ellen DeGeneres on Finding Dory: Her disability becomes her strength video interview5

References

  1. ^ Toy Story 2 (www.theguardian.com)
  2. ^ Toy Story 3 (www.theguardian.com)
  3. ^ Finding Nemo (www.theguardian.com)
  4. ^ Ellen DeGeneres (www.theguardian.com)
  5. ^ Ellen DeGeneres on Finding Dory: Her disability becomes her strength video interview (www.theguardian.com)

Review: the greener, techier Ford Ranger pick-up

What s this?

The new Ford Ranger. It is of course Ford s newest pick-up truck, but oddly, the bits Ford are shouting about have nothing at all to do with off-roading load capacity or towing ability. Hmm.

You call that a pick-up truck?

I m aware a fair few of you who tune into TG.com are peering across from North America, where trucks are a cult, a tribal way of life. And by comparison, what we Brits think of as a hulking parade float of chrome and brawn is pretty much a Happy Meal toy to you guys. We don t get the forbidden fruit of F150s and Supercabs and Duramaxes over here. What we get is the Ranger, now more efficient and teched-out than any commerical Ford truck ever.

Time for some numbers.

No V8s here, but you do have a choice between two four-cylinder diesels or a 197bhp 3.2-litre job. Most Brits will want the four-pots, which, now Ford s included stop-start, electric power steering and new gear ratios, kick out CO2 in 171g/km-sized lumps. In the case of the 158bhp version (there s also a 128bhp four-cylinder entry-level Ranger), that s all the way down for 206g/km in the old truck. Claimed fuel economy has shot up from 36.2mpg to a much more palatable 43.5mpg. All very worthy, cost-effective stuff for a vehicle that s designed to be the cornerstone of its owner s entire business. We re driving the 3.2-litre Double Cab Limited, which costs 31,834 when you include VAT, which most buyers will dodge.

Still, most of those four-cylinder pick-ups are little more than farm hacks gussied up with chrome and alloys, right?

The tide is turning. Okay, all the manufacturer chatter about these trucks becoming indistinguishable from crossovers is claptrap the Ranger s 3.2-litre engine clatters loudly and even with 347lb ft from 1500rpm, doesn t move the truck forward at a rate above leisurely . It does weigh 2167kg when empty, in fairness. Nissan made a big deal about the latest Navara1 having best-in-class ride quality by ditching leaf springs for independent rear suspension, and at the time, it felt pretty impressive. But the Ranger, still leaf-sprung at the rear, pulls off the same trick of not feeling like its feet are tied together, maintaining some comfort and dexterity even when you re using precisely none of the 1260kg payload capacity, which tends to settle down jumpy, fidgeting trucks. It s no Edge crossover, but for a workhorse, Ford s done a nice job. The six-speed automatic gearbox (a 1250 option) deserves a nod for smoothing out progress too.

How much crossover stuff has leaked into the cabin?

A lot, (in this Limited spec test car, which is the other thing Ford s quite keen to push for the latest Ranger). For a kickoff, you get the Sync 2 touchscreen interface which you ll recognise from the Focus, Edge, Mondeo and so on. Not that you ll remember it fondly. It s not a good system, suffering from laggy operation and too many sub menus accessed via fiddly buttons . Nissan s infotainment from the Navara, and Toyota s gubbins in the new Hilux are miles less frustrating. Instead, Ford s heaped in (for a fee), the building blocks of self-driving tech: lane-keep assist, road sign reading, and adaptive cruise control. Not ground-breaking stuff these days, but significant that trucks are no longer being denied toys once the preserve of cars. Ford wraps this lot up with automatic headlights and pre-crash braking, for 1350. The Japanese trucks don t offer this tech

Any good off-road?

Don t know, sorry. The Limited has all-wheel drive (or selectable rear-drive to save fuel), plus hill launch and descent control, low-range gearing and 800mm of wading potential. All highly competitive, but we didn t have chance to try it out. Likely, the Ranger would ve enjoyed being taken into the rough. Excelled, even. But it s more impressive back on the road, thoroughly habitable and easy to drive. For a teeny European pick-up, anyway.

References

  1. ^ the latest Navara (www.topgear.com)

Finding Dory – review: Pixar sequel about forgetful fish is sadly so forgettable

Well, it couldn t last for ever. From A Bug s Life to Inside Out by way of Ratatouille and The Incredibles, Pixar1 delivered animated hits for everyone. For 21 years, the studio has tugged at our heartstrings, dazzled our eyeballs and kept our brains engaged since Toy Story. Then came the tepid Cars 2, followed by Monsters University while your reviewer was the only person with anything good to say about last year s The Good Dinosaur. This sequel to 2003 s beloved Finding Nemo turns out to be a disappointment too, a toon that may appeal to ankle-biters but feels several steps backwards in terms of storytelling and visuals.

It s the sort of movie that would have seemed quite special 15 years ago but now looks positively stale. And I never thought I d say that about a Pixar movie. As ever, the film is preceded by a short, concerning the adventures of a young sandpiper struggling to retrieve food from the edge of the sea. It s sweet, charming and a true showcase for Pixar s gifted animators.

Alas, the technical virtuosity proves to be in sharp contrast to the main feature that follows.

Ellen DeGeneres2 voices forgetful regal tang fish Dory who, when separated from her parents (Eugene Levy and Diane Keaton), teams up with clownfish Nemo and his dad (Hayden Rolence and Albert Brooks) to cross the ocean for a reunion. The voice cast also includes Bill Hader, Willem Dafoe and, most memorably, British actors Idris Elba and Dominic West as a pair of sea lions. As anyone who s seen Finding Nemo will realise, the plot is a reheat with the feelings of deja vu not helped by jokes concerning Dory s memory loss that are repeated at least 10 times too often.

The same goes for a celebrity cameo that s milked for all it s worth. The visuals also seem to be a throwback to 2003. While the marine creatures are nicely animated with pleasing expressions, the ocean they call home has a slightly murky, muddy quality to it.

It s ironic that a film about a forgetful fish should be so forgettable.

The Reel Lowdown

Best quote: Dory to her parents: If I forgot you, would you forget me?

Best bit: The short film, Piper, that plays before the main feature.

Worst bit: Weak effects and storyline.

If you liked… The Incredible Journey, Ice Age: Collision Course, Cars… you ll like this

Finding Dory - Review: Pixar Sequel About Forgetful Fish Is Sadly So Forgettable 3 Watch this video again

Watch Next

Click to play Tap to play The Live Event you are trying to watch is either unavailable or has not started Please refresh this page in your browser to reload this live event video Movie Name 4

5

References

  1. ^ Pixar (www.mirror.co.uk)
  2. ^ Ellen DeGeneres (www.mirror.co.uk)
  3. ^

1 2 3 9
Categories